blips

Read this post on if:book today re: using Heidegger to contest Birkerts’ arguments against the Kindle.  Not too interested in that argument, but Heidegger’s terms here resonate somewhat with me.  The idea of “readiness-to-hand” and the way all tools exist in a network/environment connects with Gibson’s idea of affordances.  Here’s Piepenbring’s gloss on Heidegger:

In his seminal Being and Time, Heidegger considers equipment and utility: how we relate to our tools, how the tools relate to one another, and how a network of tools mitigates our surroundings. “Equipment,” he avers, “can genuinely show itself only in dealings cut to its own measure” (98).* Well-designed tools possess something he dubs “readiness-to-hand.” Roughly defined, the more something is suited to the use it is made for, the more ready-to-hand it becomes. Readiness-to-hand entails a kind of integration with the environment, an invisibility; the tool belongs so much in the world that we seldom realize we’re using it as we work. So that we may gape at his obscurity, here’s how Heidegger puts it:

The peculiarity of what is proximally ready-to-hand is that, in its readiness-to-hand, it must, as it were, withdraw in order to be ready-to-hand quite authentically. That with which our everyday dealings proximally dwell is not the tools themselves. On the contrary, that with which we concern ourselves primarily is the work — that which is to be produced at the time; and this is accordingly ready-to-hand too. The work bears with it that referential totality within which the equipment is encountered. (99)

Consider, for example, a computer keyboard. When I type on mine, I’m ordinarily unaware of it. Since it’s well-designed and fully functioning, I have no phenomenological reason to take notice of its existence — instead, I concentrate on what I’m typing. The keyboard is incorporated in my location, existing in tandem with my monitor, my lamp and, yes, the intimidating paperback edition of Being and Time resting on my desk.

via if:book: design and dasein: heidegger against the birkerts argument.

What might be useful here is the way tools organically become useful and visible when they are appropriate.  This is very much one of the keys to tinkering/DIY/techne.  I usually think of Pirsig’s beer can shim for the motorcycle handlebars here–the aluminum becomes a useful item (as opposed to garbage, or recycling) in an network of items that  includes of loose handlebars.  Of course, the narrator’s buddy isn’t about to put a beer can in his BMW bike, so for him, the can remains garbage.  Ready-to-hand is always situated in the moment and an environment, but also becomes visible (as a solution) to a specific person.